This is your Member Reference Number (MRN). You’ll need to provide this when you make an appointment with an EAP counselor or contact your EAP by phone.

Anthem provides automatic translation into multiple languages, courtesy of Google Translate. This tool is provided for your convenience only. The English language version is considered the most accurate, and in the event of a discrepancy between the translations, the English version will prevail. This translation tool is not controlled by Anthem, and the Anthem Privacy Statement will not apply. Please read Google's privacy statement. If you want Google to translate the Anthem website, select a language.

Benefits with The Local Choice

Your EAP offers these great resources.

Correction to Fight Your Ticket & Win in California on the “Were You Caught in an Illegal Radar Speed Trap?” Flowchart

In Fight Your Ticket & Win in California, there are several omissions in the “Were You Caught in an Illegal Radar Speed Trap?” flowchart. In the 16th edition, page 33 is affected. Despite the omissions in the flowchart on page 33, there’s a more complete description of the law on page 34. (Readers should also refer to VC § 40802.)

The problematic paragraph on the flowchart states:

Was the speed limit on the road “justified” by a traffic survey performed (1) in the last five years, or (2) within the last seven years, with the officer being certified to use radar or laser and the radar or laser device being certified by NTSA and calibrated independently within the last three years?

The paragraph should state:

Was the speed limit on the road “justified” by a traffic survey performed:

(1) in the last five years

(2) within the last seven years, with the officer being certified to use radar or laser, the radar or laser device being certified by NTSA and calibrated independently within the last three years, and (for alleged violations other than VC § § 22349, 22356, or 22406) the driver’s speed being unsafe for the conditions present at the time of the alleged violation, or

(3) within the last ten years, with the conditions of (2) being met and an engineer having certified that within the last ten years there have been “no significant changes” in the roadway’s use or traffic patterns?

More about this Topics

  • Constitutional Rights in Juvenile Cases

  • What is an Alibi?

  • Defendants Incentives for Accepting Plea Bargains

  • Fighting a Ticket for Running a Stop Sign

  • Search Warrants: What They Are and When Theyre Necessary

Other Topics

    • Help for International Crime Victims
    • Help for Crime Victims
    • Fighting a Red Light Camera Traffic Ticket
    • Traffic Tickets for Improper Passing
    • Defenses to Criminal Charges
    • Drunk Driving, DUI, and DWI FAQ
    • When Juveniles Are Tried in Adult Criminal Court
    • Coping with Crime Victimization
    • Getting a Restraining Order Against an Abusive Partner (Part 1)
    • Leaving an Abusive Relationship (Part 2)
    • What You Can Do if You're a Victim of Crime
    • Getting a Restraining Order Against an Abusive Partner (Part 2)