This is your Member Reference Number (MRN). You’ll need to provide this when you make an appointment with an EAP counselor or contact your EAP by phone.

Carelon provides automatic translation into multiple languages, courtesy of Google Translate. This tool is provided for your convenience only. The English language version is considered the most accurate, and in the event of a discrepancy between the translations, the English version will prevail. This translation tool is not controlled by Carelon, and the Carelon Privacy Statement will not apply. Please read Google's privacy statement. If you want Google to translate the Carelon website, select a language.

Correction to Fight Your Ticket & Win in California on the “Were You Caught in an Illegal Radar Speed Trap?” Flowchart

In Fight Your Ticket & Win in California, there are several omissions in the “Were You Caught in an Illegal Radar Speed Trap?” flowchart. In the 16th edition, page 33 is affected. Despite the omissions in the flowchart on page 33, there’s a more complete description of the law on page 34. (Readers should also refer to VC § 40802.)

The problematic paragraph on the flowchart states:

Was the speed limit on the road “justified” by a traffic survey performed (1) in the last five years, or (2) within the last seven years, with the officer being certified to use radar or laser and the radar or laser device being certified by NTSA and calibrated independently within the last three years?

The paragraph should state:

Was the speed limit on the road “justified” by a traffic survey performed:

(1) in the last five years

(2) within the last seven years, with the officer being certified to use radar or laser, the radar or laser device being certified by NTSA and calibrated independently within the last three years, and (for alleged violations other than VC § § 22349, 22356, or 22406) the driver’s speed being unsafe for the conditions present at the time of the alleged violation, or

(3) within the last ten years, with the conditions of (2) being met and an engineer having certified that within the last ten years there have been “no significant changes” in the roadway’s use or traffic patterns?

More about this Topics

  • Accomplices, Accessories, Aiders, and Abettors

  • Criminal Trial Procedures: An Overview

  • DUI and DWI Defenses

  • Criminal Arrests and Interrogations FAQ

  • Rape and Statutory Rape

Other Topics

    • Help for Crime Victims
    • Help for International Crime Victims
    • Getting a Restraining Order Against an Abusive Partner (Part 1)
    • Leaving an Abusive Relationship (Part 1)
    • What You Can Do if You're a Victim of Crime
    • Leaving an Abusive Relationship (Part 2)
    • Coping with Crime Victimization
    • Fighting a Traffic Ticket for Improper Turning
    • Going to Court: Surviving the Courtroom
    • Traffic Ticket? Decide Whether to Fight in Traffic Court or Pay Up
    • Burglary Basics
    • How Defendants Mental States Affect Their Responsibility for a Crime